|  
              
                
                  | 
 | 
 | 
 |  
                  | 
 
 Rui CastroProfessorMcGill University
 
 
 
 |  | 
 |    Jump to: Personal Information
 Research
 Activities related to Macroeconomics
 
 Personal InformationCV: PDF
   
 
 Research
              IDEAS  (with
              links to the papers below)
              Google Scholar Working Papers:
 
 
 
                  The
                      Dynamics of Firm-level Pay: Theory and Evidence from
                      Portugal, with
                  Gian Luca
                    Clementi.December 2023.  PDF (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 Recent empirical work
                      has emphasized the role played by firms in shaping
                      earnings inequality. In this paper, we build a tractable
                      model of firm-pay heterogeneity, by  introducing
                      labor market's monopsonistic power in a Hopenhayn-style
                      firm dynamics framework. The model naturally generates
                      wage-size premia. We use our theory to help understand the
                      dynamics of earnings inequality in Portugal. Like in other
                      developed economies, earnings inequality in Portugal has
                      increased sharply from the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s.
                      However, it has been steeply decreasing ever since. We
                      trace this unique dynamics to firm-level changes. The sole
                      factor pushing inequality downwards has been a larger
                      compression in firm pay, mostly driven by a decline in the
                      pass-through from firm-level productivity to wages. Our
                      model suggests that a decrease in firms' labor market
                      power may have been a chief determinant of such decline.
 
 
 Published and Forthcoming
                  Papers:
 
 
              Labor Force Transitions,
                with Fabian Lange 
                and Markus
                  Poschke, forthcoming in the Handbook of Labor
                    Economics, November 2024.  PDF
                (working paper).
 Abstract
 
 Labor Force States and
                    flows between are useful tools to model individual dynamics
                    in the labor market. This chapter reviews recent literature
                    uncovering substantial heterogeneity in transitions across
                    Labor Force States. We review methods and results by
                    replicating leading studies using Canadian data and relate
                    our findings to important literatures on recall
                    non-employment, duration dependence, and job ladders.
 
 
Occupational
                      Choice, Human Capital, and Financial Constraints,
                with Pavel
                  Sevcík.Canadian Journal of Economics, Symposium Issue
                on “Misallocation and Structural Transformation,” August 2024.
 PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper).
 
 Abstract
 
  We
                    study the aggregate productivity effects of firm-level
                    financial frictions. Credit constraints affect not only
                    production decisions, but also household-level schooling
                    decisions. In turn, entrepreneurial schooling decisions
                    impact firm-level productivities, whose cross-sectional
                    distribution becomes endogenous. In anticipation of future
                    constraints, entrepreneurs under-invest in schooling early
                    in life. Frictions lower aggregate productivity because
                    talent is misallocated across occupations, and capital
                    misallocated across firms. Firm-level productivities are
                    also lower due to schooling distortions. These effects
                    combined account for between 36% and 68% of the U.S.-India
                    aggregate productivity difference. Schooling distortions are
                    the major source of aggregate productivity differences.
 
 
Explaining
                  the Evolution of Educational Attainment in the U.S.,
                with Daniele
                  Coen-Pirani.American
                  Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, July 2016. 
                    PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 We study
                    the evolution of educational attainment of the 1932-1972
                    cohorts using a calibrated model of investment in human
                    capital with heterogeneous learning ability. The
                    inter-cohort variation in schooling is driven by changes in
                    skill prices, tuition, and education quality over time, and
                    average learning ability across cohorts. A version of the
                    model with static expectations is successful in accounting
                    for the main patterns in the data. Rising skill prices for
                    college explain the rapid increase in college graduation
                    till the 1948 cohort. The measured decline in average
                    learning ability contributes to explain the stagnation in
                    college graduation between the 1948 and 1972 cohorts.
 
 
Cross-Sectoral
                  Variation in Firm-Level Idiosyncratic Risk, with Gian
                  Luca Clementi and Yoonsoo
                  Lee.Journal of
                  Industrial Economics, March 2015.  PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 We estimate the
                    volatility of plant-level idiosyncratic shocks in the U.S.
                    manufacturing sector. Our measure of volatility is the
                    variation in Revenue Total Factor Productivity which is not
                    explained by either industry or economy-wide factors, or by
                    establishments' characteristics. Consistent with previous
                    studies, we find that idiosyncratic shocks are much larger
                    than aggregate random disturbances, accounting for about 80%
                    of the overall uncertainty faced by plants. The extent of
                    cross-sectoral variation in the volatility of shocks is
                    remarkable. Plants in the most volatile sector are subject
                    to about six times as much idiosyncratic uncertainty as
                    plants in the least volatile. We provide evidence suggesting
                    that idiosyncratic risk is higher in industries where the
                    extent of creative destruction is likely to be greater.
 
 
On
                  the Individual Optimality of Economic Integration, with
                Nelnan
                  Koumtingué.Journal of
                  Monetary Economics, November 2014.  PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 Which countries find it
                    individually optimal to form an economic union? We emphasize
                    the risk-sharing benefits of economic integration. We
                    consider an endowment world economy model, where
                    international financial markets are incomplete and contracts
                    not enforceable. A union is an arrangement that solves both
                    the market incompleteness and the lack of enforcement
                    problems among member countries. The union as a whole still
                    faces these frictions when trading in the world economy. We
                    uncover conditions on the initial income and net foreign
                    assets of potential union members such that forming a union
                    is welfare-improving over standing alone in the world
                    economy. Our model predicts that economic unions (i) occur
                    relatively infrequently, and (ii) are more likely to emerge
                    among homogeneous countries, and (iii) among rich countries.
                    
 
  
Asset
Pricing
                  in a Production Economy with Chew-Dekel Risk Preferences,
                with Claudio
                    Campanale and Gian
                  Luca Clementi.Review of
                  Economic Dynamics, April 2010.  PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
  In
                    this paper we provide a thorough characterization of the
                    asset returns implied by a simple general equilibrium
                    production economy with Chew-Dekel risk
                    preferences and convex capital adjustment costs. When
                    households display levels of disappointment aversion
                    consistent with the experimental evidence, a version of the
                    model parameterized to match the volatility of output and
                    consumption growth generates unconditional expected asset
                    returns and price of risk in line with the historical data.
                    For the model with Epstein-Zin preferences to generate
                    similar statistics, the relative risk aversion coefficient
                    needs to be at least 50, two orders of magnitude higher than
                    the estimates available so far. We argue that this is not
                    surprising, given the limited risk imposed on agents by a
                    reasonably calibrated stochastic growth model.  
 
The
                  Economic Effects of Improving Investor Rights in Portugal,
                with Gian Luca
                  Clementi. Portuguese
                  Economic Journal, August 2009.  PDF
                (journal)   PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 The Portuguese economy
                    has performed remarkably well since joining the EU in 1986.
                    Output per worker grew at an annual rate of 2.25%. The
                    relative price of investment has declined. Real investment
                    has increased compared to output, in part fueled by an
                    increase in capital inflows. At the same time, resource
                    allocation seems to have improved as well: firm-level data
                    shows a significant decline in the dispersion of labor
                    productivity and size across firms. This paper argues that
                    improvements in outside investor rights that have taken
                    place since Portugal joined the EU is a prime candidate to
                    explain this set of facts.
 
 
Legal
Institutions,
                  Sectoral Heterogeneity, and Economic Development, with
                G. L. Clementi
                and G. MacDonald.
                 Review of
                  Economic Studies, April 2009.   PDF
                (journal)    PDF
                (working paper)
 Abstract
 
  Poor
                    countries have lower PPP-adjusted investment rates and face
                    higher 8relative prices of investment goods. It has been
                    suggested that this happens either because these countries
                    have a relatively lower TFP in industries producing capital
                    goods, or because they are subject to greater investment
                    distortions. This paper provides a micro-foundation for the
                    cross-country dispersion in investment distortions. We first
                    document that firms producing capital goods face a higher
                    level of idiosyncratic risk than their counterparts
                    producing consumption goods. In a model of capital
                    accumulation where the protection of investors' rights is
                    incomplete, this difference in risk induces a wedge between
                    the returns on investment in the two sectors. The wedge is
                    bigger, the poorer the investor protection. In turn, this
                    implies that countries endowed with weaker institutions face
                    higher relative prices of investment goods, invest a lower
                    fraction of their income, and end up being poorer. We find
                    that our mechanism may be quantitatively important. 
 
Why
                  Have Aggregate Skilled Hours Become So Cyclical since the
                  Mid-1980s? with Daniele
                  Coen-Pirani.International Economic Review,
                February 2008.   PDF
                (journal)    PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 We document and discuss a
                    dramatic change in the cyclical behavior of aggregate
                    skilled hours since the mid-1980's. Using CPS data for
                    1979:1-2003:4, we find that the volatility of skilled hours
                    relative to the volatility of GDP has nearly tripled since
                    1984. In contrast, the cyclical properties of unskilled
                    hours have remained essentially unchanged. We evaluate
                    whether a simple supply/demand model for skilled and
                    unskilled labor with capital-skill complementarity in
                    production can help explain this stylized fact. Our model
                    accounts for about sixty percent of the observed increase in
                    the relative volatility of skilled labor.
 
 
Economic
Development
under
Alternative
                  Trade Regimes.International Economic Review,
                May 2006.    PDF
                (journal)    PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 How does openness affect
                    economic development? This question is answered in the
                    context of a dynamic general equilibrium model of the world
                    economy, where countries have technological differences that
                    are both sector-neutral and specific to the investment goods
                    sector. Relative to a benchmark case of trade in credit
                    markets only, consider (i) a complete restriction of trade,
                    and (ii) a full liberalization of trade. The first change
                    decreases the cross-sectional dispersion of incomes only
                    slightly, and produces a relatively small welfare loss. The
                    second change, instead, decreases dispersion by a
                    significant amount, and produces a very large welfare gain.
 
 
Economic
Development
and
Growth
                    in the World Economy. Review of
                  Economic Dynamics, January 2005.   PDF 
(journal)
                   PDF (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 This paper investigates
                    whether technological shocks, constructed to be consistent
                    with the observed cross-country income dispersion, are also
                    capable of accounting for development regularities related
                    to capital accumulation. This question is approached via a
                    quantitative theoretical analysis of a model of an
                    integrated world economy. An open economy framework
                    constrains country heterogeneity to be consistent with
                    international capital flows. Moreover, it enables the study
                    of distinctively open economy development facts. The model
                    produces time-invariant long-run cross-sectional
                    distributions for the relevant development variables, whose
                    properties are quantitatively compared with the Penn World
                    Table data set. The model generates too little dispersion in
                    capital-output ratios and investment rates. However, it is
                    consistent with the relative importance of investment,
                    saving, and international capital flows for economic
                    development.
 
 
Investor
Protection,
Optimal
Incentives,
                  and Economic Growth, with Gian
                  Luca Clementi and Glenn
                  MacDonald.Quarterly Journal of Economics,
                August 2004.   PDF
                (journal)    PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 Does investor protection
                    foster economic growth? To assess the widely-held
                    affirmative view, we introduce investor protection in a
                    standard overlapping generations model of capital
                    accumulation. Better investor protection implies better
                    risk-sharing. Because of entrepreneurs'
risk-aversion,
                    this results in a larger demand for capital. This is the demand effect. A second
                    effect (the supply effect)
                    follows from general equilibrium restrictions. Better
                    protection (i.e. higher demand) increases the interest rate
                    and lowers the income of entrepreneurs, decreasing current
                    savings and next period's supply of capital. The supply
                    effect is stronger the tighter are the restrictions on
                    capital flows. Our model thus predicts that the (positive)
                    effect of investor protection on growth is stronger for
                    countries with lower restrictions. Cross-country data
                    provides support for this prediction, as does the detailed
                    examination of the growth experiences of South Korea and
                    India.
 
 
Compensations
as
Signaling
Devices
                  in the Political Economy of Reforms, with Daniele
                  Coen-Pirani.International Economic Review,
                August 2003.    PDF
                (journal)    PDF
                (working paper)
 
 Abstract
 
 We propose an explanation
                    for why efficient reforms are not carried out when losers
                    can block their implementation and compensations are
                    feasible. In our model, a government tries to sequentially
                    implement two efficient reforms by bargaining with interest
                    groups. The organization of interest groups is endogenous.
                    Compensations are distortionary and different governments
                    care differently about distortions. Governments use low
                    compensations to discourage losers who just want to receive
                    transfers from organizing. This comes at the cost of reforms
                    being blocked by interest groups with relatively high
                    losses, resulting in a bias against payment of compensations
                    and the implementation of reforms.
 
 Other Publications:
 
 
              Trajectoires
                  possibles pour le marché du travail au Québec suite à la crise
                  de la Covid-19, with Fabian
                  Lange  and Markus
                  Poschke, prepared for the Québec Ministry of Finance,
                September 2020 (in French).   PDF.
 
 
Education
                  and Tuiton Fees, with Michel
                  Poitevin. Actualité
                  Économique, September 2014.   
                PDF
                (journal, in French)   PDF
                (CIRANO Burgundy Report
                2013RB-01, in French)
 
 
 
Growth
in
                  Open Economies, Neoclassical Models.The Princeton
                  Encyclopedia of the World Economy, Eds. K. Reinert and
                R. Rajan, Princeton University Press, 2009.
 Google
                  Books  (partial link).
 Work in Progress:
 
 
              Tuition Subsidies as a Tool for
                    Economic Development,
                with Pavel
                  Sevcík.
 
Stimulative
                  Effects of Temporary Corporate Tax Cuts, with William
                  Gbohoui.
 
 
 Activities related to
                MacroeconomicsSeminar
                schedule at McGill Canadian Macroeconomics
                Study Group (CMSG) |